-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- 店小二 on 论三座大山
- L on SVI模型拟合
- acnkid on 俄乌战争的回顾及其他
- acnkid on 外卖小哥的收入以及其他
- acnkid on 外卖小哥的收入以及其他
Archives
- August 2025
- July 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- June 2024
- April 2024
- January 2024
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- October 2022
- September 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- December 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- May 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- September 2018
- July 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- March 2016
- January 2016
- October 2015
- July 2015
- May 2015
- November 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- March 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- October 2009
- July 2009
- May 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- April 2008
- November 2007
- April 2007
Categories
Meta
Tag Archives: 融券
关于融券的一点深化认识
如果借券卖出之后,必然有人买入,其后买入方不是可以把他持有的股票再借出来,增加券源供应么?如此循环券源应该可以是本身上市股份的好几倍? 这个过程被称为再抵押(Rehypothecation)或转融通,它确实能够在一定程度上增加券源的供给。然而,这种循环并非无限,受到了一系列严格的法规、制度和实际操作的限制,因此券源不可能达到流通股本的好几倍。 借券卖出和再出借的链条 这个链条可以继续下去,形成一个“借贷链”。这就是为什么在某些极端情况下,一只股票的空头头寸(Short Interest)可以超过其总流通股本的100%。 例如,GameStop (GME) 事件中,其空头头寸一度超过了140%,就是因为同一批股票被多次转手和再出借。 为何这个循环不是无限的? 尽管存在再出借机制,但券源的供应并不会无限膨胀,主要有以下几个核心限制因素: 1. 账户类型的限制:现金账户 vs. 保证金账户 结论: 并非所有买入方都能将其持有的股票再次出借。只有当买家是保证金账户持有人并同意出借时,券源才可能增加。每一次转手,股票都有可能流入一个现金账户,从而**“锁定”**这部分券源,中断借贷链。 2. 监管规定和券商风控 3. 实际操作中的摩擦 因此,虽然借券卖出后买入方确实可能再次将股票出借,从而在一定程度上“创造”了额外的券源,但这个过程受到账户类型、严格的监管上限和市场实际操作的多重制约,绝非无限循环。 这也是为什么“券源”依然是一种稀缺资源,其价格(借券费率)会根据供需关系而剧烈波动。